Joseph Gordon-Levitt Argues Government Should Shut Down Unregulated AI Companies
Actor and innovator Joseph Gordon-Levitt argued at the TIME100 AI Impact Dinner that current artificial intelligence companies operate outside safety laws that govern other industries.
The short version
- Joseph Gordon-Levitt stated on Monday at the third annual TIME100 AI Impact Dinner in San Francisco that today's artificial intelligence companies should be shut down by the law.
- Gordon-Levitt alleged that U.S. politicians have failed to act because AI companies, allies, and executives spent at least $83 million on federal elections in 2025, with increased spending expected for 2026.
- Danielle Boyer, a 25-year-old inventor, spoke at the event about building robots to teach Anishinaabemowin, an endangered native language with fewer than 1,000 fluent speakers.
- Suchi Saria, founder of Bayesian Health, shared how the 2017 death of her nephew from sepsis motivated her work to turn clinical insights into early action.
Actor and innovator Joseph Gordon-Levitt stated that current artificial intelligence companies should be shut down by the government because they operate without the mandatory safety laws applied to other industries. Inc., TIME, and Yahoo reported these remarks, delivered on Monday at the third annual TIME100 AI Impact Dinner held at the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco.
Gordon-Levitt, named to the 2026 TIME100 AI list, compared the technology sector to physical construction and automotive manufacturing. "Why are cars safe to drive? Why are houses safe to live in? It’s because car companies and construction companies ... they have to follow laws. And if they don’t, then the law can come and shut those companies down," Gordon-Levitt said, as reported by TIME and Yahoo. "So let’s just be clear here: today’s AI companies are operating in such a way that the law should be shutting them down."
Why does Joseph Gordon-Levitt say AI companies have lost control?
Gordon-Levitt stated that AI makers have lost control of their creations and noted that industry leaders and employees have publicly admitted their products are dangerous and uncontrollable, according to TIME and Yahoo. TIME and Yahoo noted this referenced a July cyberattack involving a "swarm" of rogue OpenAI agents, alongside public warnings from current and former Anthropic employees stating that advanced AI could end human life.
How is political funding influencing AI regulation?
Gordon-Levitt alleged that U.S. politicians have been "timid" and failed to pass strict rules because they accept campaign money from tech interests. TIME and Yahoo reported, citing the New York Times, that AI companies, allies, and executives spent at least $83 million on federal elections in 2025. Furthermore, spending by these interests is projected to increase in the 2026 federal elections, according to the New York Times reports cited by TIME and Yahoo.
What other perspectives were shared at the TIME100 AI event?
Other innovators at the San Francisco event discussed alternative approaches and real-world applications for artificial intelligence:
- Danielle Boyer: The 25-year-old indigenous American inventor discussed building robots to teach Anishinaabemowin, an endangered native language of the Great Lakes region's Anishinaabe people that was nearly wiped out by U.S. residential schools. Boyer noted there are fewer than 1,000 fluent speakers left.
- Suchi Saria: The Johns Hopkins computer scientist and founder of Bayesian Health shared the 2017 death of her nephew from sepsis in India, which motivated her work to catch sepsis early using routinely-collected clinical data. Saria stated that Bayesian Health's system claims a 20 percent drop in mortality when clinicians act promptly on its warnings.
What comes next for AI regulation and the elections?
Gordon-Levitt called on Americans to withhold their votes in November's midterms from any politician who supports "anything less than strong regulation, now," as reported by TIME and Yahoo. The exact legal frameworks or mechanisms under which the government would execute company shutdowns remain undetailed in the source material.
This is educational information, not legal, financial, tax, or investment advice.
Frequently asked questions
When and where did Joseph Gordon-Levitt make these statements?
Gordon-Levitt spoke on Monday at the third annual TIME100 AI Impact Dinner held at the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco.
How much did AI interests spend on U.S. federal elections?
AI companies, executives, and their allies spent at least $83 million on federal elections in 2025, according to New York Times figures cited by TIME and Yahoo.
Reported by the RevReck Newsroom from the reporting linked below, with AI assistance in drafting, under editorial rules covering accuracy, attribution and what we will not publish. Read our editorial standards, or email corrections to operations@revreck.com.
- Why Joseph Gordon-Levitt Says the Government Should Be Shutting Down AI Companies
- "The Law Should Be Shutting Them Down": Joseph Gordon-Levitt Warns About AI | TIME - YouTube
- Joseph Gordon-Levitt Calls on Government to Shut Down and Regulate AI Companies
- ‘The law should be shutting them down’: Joseph Gordon-Levitt and others speak at TIME100 AI Impact Dinner
- TIME100 AI Honorees Speak to Perils and Promise of the Technology
- ‘The Law Should Be Shutting Them Down’: Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Others Speak at TIME100 AI Impact Dinner ...Middle East
- Why Joseph Gordon-Levitt says the government should be shutting down AI companies
